CAP Pilot Study: The Effect of a 3 Week Resisted Sprint Interval Training Protocol on Recovery Heart Rate, VO2 Max and Speed. **Scott Moody Introduction Training Protocol:
This interval was repeated 4 times in a row during the pre and post-test then the subject would walk at a slow, but steady pace for 1 minute. Then this ratio of 2 minutes working to 1 minute resting would repeat 10 times for a total of 30 minutes. The reason we chose the 30 second interval rather than the 60 or 90 second interval that we have used in the past was based on the adaptability of the 30 second time frame and the ability of the subject to attack it more intensely rather than saving up and pacing themselves as we have seen in the 90 second interval. The times spent in each activity are loosely based on the time spent in each activity of a soccer match as described in the graphics below. We have tried to establish an intense bout of soccer specific activity that could adequately prepare them for the demands of the sport. In the 2:1 Work : Rest Interval Pre and Post-Test the time spent in each activity closely resembled the activity breakdown over a 90 minute game. Figure 5: Courtesy of www.TotalSoccerFitness.com The training protocol for the 3 week study went as follows:
The training protocol was designed to establish baselines, then focus on either quickening the speed during shorter intervals, or maintaining the pace over longer intervals. In week 3, the Force workouts put much more emphasis on sprinting speed and covering large amounts of distance in the running portions of the 30 second interval. During this time the runs on the Landis Treadmill were focused on maintaining speeds for longer periods of time to continue to push the long term energy system (aerobic conditioning) while the Force workouts started to push the intermediate energy system (anaerobic / aerobic conditioning). Testing and Results: Over the 3 week period the subject noticed greatly improved ability to maintain higher sprint speeds on the Force 30 second interval workouts which we believe would translate into the ability to maintain speed during repeated bouts of sprinting on the field in a game. Each week the speeds got faster starting out averaging 10.6 and maxing out at an 11.9 average during the 1:1 week (last workout of week 3) where the interval distance also maxed out at 100 yards per interval as opposed to 81 yard per interval in the Pre-Test. In looking at heart rate changes over the 3 week period we noticed that the subjects HR was not recovering as fast in the post test as it did in the pre-test (Figure 3) , but this could be attributed to the fact that the athlete was covering more distance, and sprinting at a much faster pace right before each recovery period. What was interesting though is that on the very last run when the subject came to a complete stop the heart rate started off at 192 and recovered to 149r within 1 minute. During the Pre-Test the subjects heart rate ended at 191 and could only recover to 159 within 1 minute. This seems to meet the design of the study – push the body harder and recover faster! When you compare this information with the % of Max HR (Figure 4) you see another interesting bit of information. The subject was working harder at each interval (running faster and covering more distance), but the % of max HR was lower until the very end where the athlete was able to push themselves to peak out (29 minutes into the workout), and still recover quickly enough within 1 minute.
As you can see in the graphs below (Figures 5 and 6) that show the improvements in yards per interval and sprint speed per interval show that the subject was improving in both categories.
Overall the pilot study showed exactly what we had anticipated and this is represented in the graphs below. Figure 7 shows the improvement in Pre and Post-Test Force 30 second interval 2:1 Protocol and Figure 8 shows the improvements in 12 minute run distance and its correlated VO2 max score.
Practical Applications and Comparisons: Over the last few years we have been searching for a protocol that not only helped develop VO2 max, but also helped develop the powerful acceleration type sprint speeds. This protocol has proved to us that we are on the right track with the Woodway Force 30 second interval test. Training time was always set at 30 minutes and the subject went through 4 workouts per week plus 1 recover jog that was set at 20 minutes. Based on the improvements in HR Recovery, VO2 Max, Resisted Sprint Speed, and Distance Covered in 30 seconds we feel that this protocol could be a good Pre-Season Program Conditioning Program for soccer players as well as basketball players. We also feel that shorter variations of this program would be great during the season to maintain dynamic leg strength, sprint endurance, and VO2 max.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| © 2008 Centers for Athletic Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||